Advertisement
How the World Works
Advice to Bush: Break up Monsanto
Andrew Leonard
www.salon.com/tech/htww/2...up_monsanto/
Alexei Barrionuevo's roundup of all things ethanol in today's New York Times, setting the stage for an expected announcement tonight by President Bush calling for significantly increased ethanol consumption in the United States, is a generally good introduction to the topic. But one fragment caught my eye:
Responding to concerns that there just isn't enough corn to supply expected future demand, Agriculture Secretary Mike Johans was described as "confident that more corn will emerge to ease the pain of higher grain prices, as seed companies improve yields."
Seed companies? Now, who might that be? As of 2005, worldwide, 10 companies controlled about 50 percent of the global seed business. At the top of the heap are just three companies, Monsanto, Dupont and Syngenta. Industry concentration is continuing to proceed apace. Monsanto is currently waiting for antitrust approval to complete its merger with the 11th largest seed company, Delta Pine & Land. All three companies have been snapping up smaller firms at every opportunity.
All three are also huge chemical and pesticide conglomerates that are aggressively pursuing advanced genetic modification technologies. So when Secretary Johans talks about seed companies improving yields, what he's really saying is that a tiny group of huge multinational chemical companies will be introducing a steady stream of new transgenic corn strains, in a frantic attempt to keep innovating humanity's way out of an energy crisis.
Let's take a break today from worrying about whether scientists are properly evaluating the potential risks to human health and the environment from transgenic research. I've only just started reading Denise Caruso's "Intervention: Confronting the Real Risks of Genetic Engineering and Life on a Biotech Planet," a clear contender for best book yet on that topic, and so we'll save a more detailed discussion of the problem for later.
Here's a different angle: A few years back, the USDA publicized research that found that seed industry consolidation had led to a decrease in research and development intensity. In a classic
display of what happens when a market is locked up by a small number of players, competition suffers and the pressure to innovate slackens: "...increased competition in R&D," concluded the researchers, "as indicated by low levels of market concentration and the participation of more competing firms in the GM crop approval process, is positively related to R&D intensity. As the number of firms declined through mergers and acquisitions, the intensity of R&D fell."
If President Bush and Mike Johans want to put some muscle behind their faith that new breeds of corn will deliver ever-higher yields, maybe they ought to do something about the continuing consolidation of control over the seed industry. Stop Monsanto's merger with Delta Pine & Land, which will give the St. Louis giant effective control over cotton seed. Even better, break it up. Let a hundred seed companies bloom, instead of just a few.
Just trying to be helpful here. President Bush has some really low poll approval ratings going into tonight's State of the Union speech. It's time for bold moves!
(Thanks to TW)
Advice to Bush: Break up Monsanto
Andrew Leonard
www.salon.com/tech/htww/2...up_monsanto/
Alexei Barrionuevo's roundup of all things ethanol in today's New York Times, setting the stage for an expected announcement tonight by President Bush calling for significantly increased ethanol consumption in the United States, is a generally good introduction to the topic. But one fragment caught my eye:
Responding to concerns that there just isn't enough corn to supply expected future demand, Agriculture Secretary Mike Johans was described as "confident that more corn will emerge to ease the pain of higher grain prices, as seed companies improve yields."
Seed companies? Now, who might that be? As of 2005, worldwide, 10 companies controlled about 50 percent of the global seed business. At the top of the heap are just three companies, Monsanto, Dupont and Syngenta. Industry concentration is continuing to proceed apace. Monsanto is currently waiting for antitrust approval to complete its merger with the 11th largest seed company, Delta Pine & Land. All three companies have been snapping up smaller firms at every opportunity.
All three are also huge chemical and pesticide conglomerates that are aggressively pursuing advanced genetic modification technologies. So when Secretary Johans talks about seed companies improving yields, what he's really saying is that a tiny group of huge multinational chemical companies will be introducing a steady stream of new transgenic corn strains, in a frantic attempt to keep innovating humanity's way out of an energy crisis.
Let's take a break today from worrying about whether scientists are properly evaluating the potential risks to human health and the environment from transgenic research. I've only just started reading Denise Caruso's "Intervention: Confronting the Real Risks of Genetic Engineering and Life on a Biotech Planet," a clear contender for best book yet on that topic, and so we'll save a more detailed discussion of the problem for later.
Here's a different angle: A few years back, the USDA publicized research that found that seed industry consolidation had led to a decrease in research and development intensity. In a classic
display of what happens when a market is locked up by a small number of players, competition suffers and the pressure to innovate slackens: "...increased competition in R&D," concluded the researchers, "as indicated by low levels of market concentration and the participation of more competing firms in the GM crop approval process, is positively related to R&D intensity. As the number of firms declined through mergers and acquisitions, the intensity of R&D fell."
If President Bush and Mike Johans want to put some muscle behind their faith that new breeds of corn will deliver ever-higher yields, maybe they ought to do something about the continuing consolidation of control over the seed industry. Stop Monsanto's merger with Delta Pine & Land, which will give the St. Louis giant effective control over cotton seed. Even better, break it up. Let a hundred seed companies bloom, instead of just a few.
Just trying to be helpful here. President Bush has some really low poll approval ratings going into tonight's State of the Union speech. It's time for bold moves!
(Thanks to TW)
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Unsu...
Delta & Pine CEO: Merger with Monsanto on track
Mon, February 5, 2007 - 10:20 PMDelta & Pine CEO: Merger with Monsanto on track'
Monday, February 05, 2007
By Angie Pointer
AUSTIN, Texas - Delta & Pine Land Co. (DLP) Chief Executive and President Tom Jagodinski said Saturday the company's planned union with Monsanto Co. (MON) is "on track" and he expects the deal to be approved by regulators.
The proposed $1.5 billion deal was announced in August, and was approved by shareholders of Delta & Pine, a cotton and soybean seed breeder, producer and marketer, on Dec. 21. The Department of Justice is reviewing the merger, and regulatory approval is still pending.
Jagodinski told Dow Jones Newswires the merger could be completed as early as six to 12 months after the August announcement.
"We hope it closes soon," he said in a telephone interview.
Delta & Pine already sells cotton seed varieties that contain Monsanto's Bollgard and Roundup Ready technologies. Bollgard protects cotton plants from insect pests such as tobacco budworm, cotton boliworm and pink bollworm, while Roundup Ready cotton is resistant to the herbicide, Roundup, which is also known by its chemical name, glyphosate.
The company also sells conventional, or non-genetically modified, seed, but that type of seed only represents a small fraction of sales.
Jagodinski said 95% of the company's seed sales last year contained one or more Monsanto traits. The company's net sales in fiscal 2006 totaled $417.6 million, the highest in the company's 91-year history.
One key benefit seen from the proposed combination is increased speed in developing and commercializing new genetically modified cotton varieties.
"Farmers will see better traits" from the combined company, Jagodinski said, noting that Monsanto has identified cotton as a strategic crop and is already developing new traits.
Despite the potential advantages, not everyone is happy with the proposed merger. In particular, competing companies such as DuPont Co. (DD) and Syngenta AG (SYT) have campaigned against the combination and have received some support in the U.S. farm belt.
On Friday, shares of Scott, Miss.-based Delta & Pine closed at $40.61.
© 2007 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
(thanks to TW) -
-
Re: Delta & Pine CEO: Merger with Monsanto on track
Tue, February 6, 2007 - 1:33 PMHey Keeth, thanks so much!
This is so scary and frustrating...
I cried watching the future of the food...
Grrrrr.
My French fellow Jose Bove is running for President and I guess there isn;t much chance he would win but at least it brings some people together, lots of people.
If only...
Thanks again!
Story, Santa Cruz too.
-
